Input
Compare the page and the canonical target.
This inspector is local and rule-based. It does not fetch the live page; it evaluates the URLs and signals you provide.
Technical SEO Review
Paste the page URL, the declared canonical URL, and related index signals. The inspector flags common problems like mismatched paths, tracking parameters, protocol drift, and weak indexability signals.
Input
This inspector is local and rule-based. It does not fetch the live page; it evaluates the URLs and signals you provide.
Verdict
Needs reviewThe inspector will summarize whether the canonical setup is clean, risky, or contradictory.
Findings
Normalized URLs
Practical guide
The tool is especially helpful when teams are dealing with path mismatches, protocol drift, query parameters, duplicate URLs, or weak indexability signals that can quietly undermine canonical setups.
What to expect
Inside the freebie
Best use cases
Useful for SEO audits, migration checks, CMS QA, canonical validation, and launch reviews on content-heavy sites.
Paste the target inputs exactly as they appear in the page or campaign you are reviewing.
Check the generated or validated result against your live naming, URL, and content conventions.
Use the output as a review checkpoint before deployment, not as a substitute for a final page check.
No. Treat the first result as a strong starting point. Review it in the context where you plan to use it, then tighten the final version before publishing or shipping.
Useful for SEO audits, migration checks, CMS QA, canonical validation, and launch reviews on content-heavy sites.
Be specific with the input, keep the job narrow, and make one change at a time between runs. That usually leads to a cleaner result than trying to solve everything in one pass.